Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Chocolate: good for the soul, good for the heart




Heart Disease, Diabetes and Stroke: More Chocolate, Less Risk? - ABC News


I really liked this article from ABC that that reported on a new review of published research on chocolate.

The review looked at 7 studies and controlled for age, diet, physical activity, body mass index and smoking and discovered that chocolate consumers had reduced risk for heart disease, diabetes and stroke.

I really like this article because instead of jumping to unfounded conclusions like a lot of the media tends to do, it merely points out that habitual chocolate intake and lower disease risk are correlated; but that it doesn't necessarily mean that that chocolate is the sole cause of the lower risk. Other factors weigh in as well. For example, a there was a study that reported that people that prayed lived longer than people the didn't. But that could also be because people who pray go to church more, are more social and therefore have a social outlet and support. Or perhaps people that pray more experience less tress because of praying. So you can never really say that correlation implies causation, but the research is interesting nonetheless and seems to support past research that has implied similar benefits of chocolate.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Formula for weight gain




So with all of my close friends either having just given birth or just about to, I have suddenly become very interested in all sorts of baby stuff, because if there's one thing a new or expectant mom needs, it's unsolicited information.

As a student of nutrition, we learn all about the health benefits of breastfeeding over formula feeding but obviously breastfeeding is sometimes not an option. Many people seem to have strong opinions about both options but obviously it's pretty difficult to say unless you're the one in that situation.

One of my coworkers just completed her Lactation Education Certification and we were having a discussion about formula fed babies and weight gain. Unfortunately, babies who gain weight rapidly during the first 4 months to 1 year of life tend to struggle with being overweight or obese later in life. Coincidentally, NPR's Patti Neighmond ran a story on why formula fed babies may experience faster weight gain, so I figured it was worth a read. I found it interesting that part of the reason formula fed babies may gain weight faster (thus possibly leading to weight issues later in life) is that  babies who are breastfeeding may satiate sooner thus consuming less breast milk. Babies' stomachs are pretty tiny as newborns and thus they really can't eat very much and the colostrum that newborns consume in the early stages of breastfeeding is very low in fat. Additionally human breast milk changes in caloric density during the life stage of the baby to address changing nutritional needs which means that volume for volume the calories, fat, carbohydrate and protein will be different between breast milk and formula depending on the life stage of the baby. Isn't the human body crazy?!

While the article brings to light some new research, it is still pretty preliminary stuff and shouldn't be used to judge mom's who aren't breastfeeding. Neighmond also profiles a few different types of formulas making this article a good resource if you had formula questions.

If you're like me and have no idea how to change a diaper, there are plenty of other things out there to read.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Bread for Bread



Lester Brown, President of the Earth Policy Institute wrote an amazing article in the April edition of Foreign Policy Magazine entitled: The New Geopolitics of Food which NPR recently highlighted in an interview with Mr. Brown. The article does a fantastic job demonstrating how food insecurity and politics are inextricably linked. If you aren't up to reading the article, I've summed up some of the main points below but the full article is definitely worth a read:

Imported food items (often grains) are the most susceptible to rising prices. In countries where poverty prevails, rising prices are felt much more severely. Brown gives the example that a rising price of wheat may mean the difference between $.10-$.20 more for a loaf of bread for us but for cities/countries where grain is purchased in the raw and where 50-70% of income is spent on food, you may actually be paying double the price for your food every day. The frustration and desperation felt by people trying to feed themselves and their families with food they can no longer afford will (and has) lead to political unrest. 

Why the issue with rising prices? It's really a simple supply and demand issue. 

According to Brown, rising food prices weren't always such a big problem. This year isn't the first year entire crops have been wiped out by drought or heavy rains. It is however one year in a series of years in which supply is dwindling. Richer nations have been able to offset decreases in grain production by using grain stores or by planting on available land. Fortunately, in the past, these types of disasters were uncommon. Currently, however, we are seeing a rise in the frequency of droughts, hurricanes, and formidable weather due to rising global temperatures. Brown cites that a rule of thumb for temperature rise is the 1 degree Celsius rise in temperature will lead to a 10% decrease in grain yields.



We have planted on almost all of the land that is available and much of the land which is vacant is barren. Production is low from poor growing conditions due to global warming, reserves are low or non-existent due to years of increasing frequency of grain shortages and vacant land is either unusable or unviable. Supply is falling short of demand, the latter of which is rising at a rapid rate. 

Rising demand is fueled by a few things: increasing population, affluence and biofuels. 219,000 extra mouths to feed every day globally puts a massive strain on global grain production – particularly since most of us consume grains either directly or indirectly as food for animals as a large part of our daily diet. As  affluence increases, so does the consumption of cattle and other grain intensive animals as people feel more inclined to eat further up the food chain. Biofuels also increase demand. Brown states that last year we produced 400 billion tons of grain and 125 million was used for ethanol production.  Demand has put an intense stain on grain supplies and little to no attention has been given as to how to properly address remedying the situation.

To tackle some of these issues, the article suggests stabilizing the world population through family planning. 215 million women stated they would like to plan families but do not have access to family planning; most of these women represent the poorest populations. Additionally, focusing on raising water productivity will also help sustain grain production. We have tripled our grain production but paid title attention to how to sustainably provide water for the crops. 

Brown warns that failing to take climate change and the food crises seriously will result in increasing shortages and rising prices-and we have already had glimpses at what this will mean on a global scale: runaway food prices and riots. 

I appreciate Brown’s attempt at taking food insecurity seriously and addressing its underlying causes when it comes to grain production. His well thought out causes of the issue and suggestions for solutions demonstrates the real need for action in this area.

I believe it is also imperative the international community finally get serious about food production/consumption and reassess our food chain and how it is broken. Thanks to Lester Brown for garnering attention to such an important issue

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Peace out Pyramid.

 Today marks the long-awaited and much-needed retirement of the 20 year old symbol of a healthy diet: The Food Guide Pyramid.
  MyPyramid.gov was the updated, snazzier version of the Food Guide Pyramid, the weird, 70's style guide for healthy eating that seems to somehow incorporate triangle shaped confetti as part of a healthy diet.



Problems with the Food Guide Pyramid were mostly that is was extremely confusing to most ordinary folks, so the USDA came up with MyPyramid.gov to show just how awesome healthy eating can be.





The idea was to promote healthful eating by designating the larger bars on the pyramid as grains (orange), veggies (green), fruits (reds) and dairy (blue) while the slimmer bars were meats and beans (purple) and fats and oils (yellow). The androgenous person climbing the stairs to the pyramid is supposed to promote physical activity; but how your average person is supposed to deduce this from a stick figure walking up the side of the pyramid is beyond me.

 Mypyramid.gov was the United States Department of Agriculture's way of conveying healthful eating and exercise for the average American. Once on mypyramid.gov there was all sorts of helpful info about eating right and you could even get a personalized diet by entering your age, gender and height. The website itself is pretty useful and easy to navigate but many nutrition professionals felt the pyramid was difficult to understand and did not address one very important issue: portion sizes.

 That is why the brand new MyPlate.gov guide is so fantastic.

  
The new feature replaces the pyramid with a plate and emphasizes vegetables and fruits as the more important groups while decreasing the amount of protein-a good message for the post-Atkins, protein-crazed American. Additionally there is no place for fats and oils and the dairy group is represented by glass-implying milk instead of cheese and fattier dairy items.

 When you click on each area of the plate the website takes you to a description of appropriate foods form that group.
Why it's better:
  • emphasizes portions
  • easier to understand
  • eliminates fats and oils 
  • emphasizes dairy from milk instead of cheese, ice cream, etc.,

 Why it isn't better:
  • physical activity is gone
  • while myplate emphasizes portions, it doesn’t really give an estimate or suggested amount unless you enter your info for a personalized plan.

 All in all the USDA did a good job recognizing the need for a change from mypyramid. It has been suggested by some that mypyramid has always been a giant billboard for whichever industry can afford to pay the highest price. For example, I know a few RDs feel the reason the dairy group is as large as it is (was) on the pyramid was because the dairy council was a big contributor to the USDA and that the dairy industry as a whole would like us to believe we are getting a lot more calcium from dairy products than we actually are. I can't comment on that because I haven't researched it enough but as we all know, pretty much every industry is influenced by money, so I wouldn’t be surprised.

However, for now the new MyPlate.gov guideline for healthful eating helps calls attention to the out of control portion size issue currently plaguing our country and its citizens. For a gander at how other countries define healthy eating, peep these dietary guidelines form around the world.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Antioxidants

Here is a super neato table that helps makes sense of the various antioxidants and where to find them.

Antioxidants work by acting as an electron donor to a free radical, which is basically an out of control molecule that causes cellular damage because it has an unpaired electron. Cellular damage and mutations are linked to pretty much every ailment possible including cancer, neuromuscular disease and degenerative diseases. When an antioxidant molecule donates its electron, it neutralizes the free radical.

Vitamins can act as antioxidants as well including vitamin C and vitamin E; but be careful with mega doses, they can also cause damage, basically negating any good effects they may have.



P.S. It only took about 19 times to get this damned thing to load right, so there is a little extra love in this post:)



Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Counter Advertising

I love these New York Department of Health counter ads for soda. I wish there were more money spent on this type of public awareness. A presentation I heard recently cited that McDonald's spent $665 million last year on advertising and the 5 a day fruit and vegetable program spent $4 million. Sad state of affairs since 34% of the United States is overweight. 



Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Finally, bacon gets its moment.

So there I am, minding my own business in my car when I am assaulted by the commercial for Denny's Baconalia. Because we really don't celebrate bacon enough in this country, especially at Denny's. If there is one thing that never gets the recognition it deserves, it's fried pork products.

As I struggle to keep the car on the road, I hear the list of items on this super fun, limited time menu. One of them is an ice cream, bacon, maple syrup sundae. Okay I get it, sweet and salty. But bacon on ice cream, oh Denny's, what am I going to do with you??

So I go to the website and try to find the nutrition info for this little gem which-big surprise-is nowhere to be found. I call the number on the website here is the info:

Maple bacon sundae:

calories: 810
fat: 40 grams
Sodium: 460 mg
sugar: 85 grams
CHO: 97 grams

So the question is, is it worth the calories and fat? As a non-meat eater, I wouldn't know but I'm not against desserts nor am I against creative cooking; however, this just strikes me as excessive and semi-depressing. thoughts?